I think there is definitely a place for both a factual and opinionated account. It gives the game more options in what is true, partially true, or an out-right lie. Even information presented as factual can be ignored in game play.
You may want to do some cut and dry facts on some aspects of the game. Many players would seek out objective books or literature on some elements (acros for example), which can be all the more fun when two "objective" books give different facts. Possibly add in some document sources or story origins: is the story from retrived (stolen) government documents or from a drunk at the local pub.
As for different stories: the people (either poverty-stricken or wealthy) in a "developing" (exploited) nation, the aliens (what they think, how the attack is going, etc), someone who exploited the situation for personal gain.
Both
I think there is definitely a place for both a factual and opinionated account. It gives the game more options in what is true, partially true, or an out-right lie. Even information presented as factual can be ignored in game play.
You may want to do some cut and dry facts on some aspects of the game. Many players would seek out objective books or literature on some elements (acros for example), which can be all the more fun when two "objective" books give different facts. Possibly add in some document sources or story origins: is the story from retrived (stolen) government documents or from a drunk at the local pub.
As for different stories: the people (either poverty-stricken or wealthy) in a "developing" (exploited) nation, the aliens (what they think, how the attack is going, etc), someone who exploited the situation for personal gain.